Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA.
Identifieur interne : 002B20 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002B19; suivant : 002B21Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA.
Auteurs : Mark D. Dixon [États-Unis] ; W Carter Johnson ; Michael L. Scott ; Daniel E. Bowen ; Lisa A. RabbeSource :
- Environmental management [ 1432-1009 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Agriculture (tendances), Conservation des ressources naturelles (tendances), Facteurs temps (MeSH), Mouvements de l'eau (MeSH), Populus (croissance et développement), Rivières (MeSH), Science forêt (méthodes), Science forêt (tendances), Systèmes d'information géographique (MeSH), Écosystème (MeSH), États-Unis (MeSH).
- MESH :
- croissance et développement : Populus.
- méthodes : Science forêt.
- tendances : Agriculture, Conservation des ressources naturelles, Science forêt.
- Facteurs temps, Mouvements de l'eau, Rivières, Systèmes d'information géographique, Écosystème, États-Unis.
- Wicri :
- geographic : États-Unis.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- geographic : United States.
- growth & development : Populus.
- methods : Forestry.
- trends : Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Forestry.
- Ecosystem, Geographic Information Systems, Rivers, Time Factors, Water Movements.
Abstract
Construction of six large dams and reservoirs on the Missouri River over the last 50-75 years has resulted in major landscape changes and alterations in flow patterns, with implications for riparian forests dominated by plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides). We quantified changes in land cover from 1892-1950s and the 1950s-2006 and the current extent and age structure of cottonwood forests on seven segments (two reservoir and five remnant floodplain) comprising 1127 km (53 %) of the unchannelized upper two-thirds of the Missouri River. Riparian forest area declined by 49 %; grassland 61 %; shrubland 52 %; and sandbar habitat 96 %; while agricultural cropland increased six-fold and river/reservoir surface area doubled from 1892 to 2006. Net rates of erosion and accretion declined between the 1892-1950s and 1950s-2006 periods. Accretion exceeded erosion on remnant floodplain segments, resulting in declines in active channel width, particularly in 1950s-2006. Across all study segments in 2006, most cottonwood stands (67 %) were >50 years old, 22 % were 25-50 years old, and only 10 % were <25 years old. Among stands <50 years old, the higher proportion of 25-50 year old stands represents recruitment that accompanied initial post-dam channel narrowing; while declines in sandbar and shrubland area and the low proportion of stands <25 years old suggest declines in geomorphic dynamism and limited recruitment under recent river management. Future conservation and restoration efforts should focus both on limiting further loss of remnant cottonwood stands and developing approaches to restore river dynamics and cottonwood recruitment processes.
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9842-5
PubMed: 22476667
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA.</title><author><name sortKey="Dixon, Mark D" sort="Dixon, Mark D" uniqKey="Dixon M" first="Mark D" last="Dixon">Mark D. Dixon</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA. Mark.Dixon@usd.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Dakota du Sud</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, W Carter" sort="Johnson, W Carter" uniqKey="Johnson W" first="W Carter" last="Johnson">W Carter Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scott, Michael L" sort="Scott, Michael L" uniqKey="Scott M" first="Michael L" last="Scott">Michael L. Scott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bowen, Daniel E" sort="Bowen, Daniel E" uniqKey="Bowen D" first="Daniel E" last="Bowen">Daniel E. Bowen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rabbe, Lisa A" sort="Rabbe, Lisa A" uniqKey="Rabbe L" first="Lisa A" last="Rabbe">Lisa A. Rabbe</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22476667</idno><idno type="pmid">22476667</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s00267-012-9842-5</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002A87</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002A87</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002A87</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002A87</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002A87</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA.</title><author><name sortKey="Dixon, Mark D" sort="Dixon, Mark D" uniqKey="Dixon M" first="Mark D" last="Dixon">Mark D. Dixon</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA. Mark.Dixon@usd.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Dakota du Sud</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, W Carter" sort="Johnson, W Carter" uniqKey="Johnson W" first="W Carter" last="Johnson">W Carter Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Scott, Michael L" sort="Scott, Michael L" uniqKey="Scott M" first="Michael L" last="Scott">Michael L. Scott</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bowen, Daniel E" sort="Bowen, Daniel E" uniqKey="Bowen D" first="Daniel E" last="Bowen">Daniel E. Bowen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rabbe, Lisa A" sort="Rabbe, Lisa A" uniqKey="Rabbe L" first="Lisa A" last="Rabbe">Lisa A. Rabbe</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Environmental management</title><idno type="eISSN">1432-1009</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture (trends)</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources (trends)</term><term>Ecosystem (MeSH)</term><term>Forestry (methods)</term><term>Forestry (trends)</term><term>Geographic Information Systems (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (growth & development)</term><term>Rivers (MeSH)</term><term>Time Factors (MeSH)</term><term>United States (MeSH)</term><term>Water Movements (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Agriculture (tendances)</term><term>Conservation des ressources naturelles (tendances)</term><term>Facteurs temps (MeSH)</term><term>Mouvements de l'eau (MeSH)</term><term>Populus (croissance et développement)</term><term>Rivières (MeSH)</term><term>Science forêt (méthodes)</term><term>Science forêt (tendances)</term><term>Systèmes d'information géographique (MeSH)</term><term>Écosystème (MeSH)</term><term>États-Unis (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>United States</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="croissance et développement" xml:lang="fr"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="growth & development" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Forestry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Science forêt</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="tendances" xml:lang="fr"><term>Agriculture</term><term>Conservation des ressources naturelles</term><term>Science forêt</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="trends" xml:lang="en"><term>Agriculture</term><term>Conservation of Natural Resources</term><term>Forestry</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Ecosystem</term><term>Geographic Information Systems</term><term>Rivers</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Water Movements</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Mouvements de l'eau</term><term>Rivières</term><term>Systèmes d'information géographique</term><term>Écosystème</term><term>États-Unis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>États-Unis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Construction of six large dams and reservoirs on the Missouri River over the last 50-75 years has resulted in major landscape changes and alterations in flow patterns, with implications for riparian forests dominated by plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides). We quantified changes in land cover from 1892-1950s and the 1950s-2006 and the current extent and age structure of cottonwood forests on seven segments (two reservoir and five remnant floodplain) comprising 1127 km (53 %) of the unchannelized upper two-thirds of the Missouri River. Riparian forest area declined by 49 %; grassland 61 %; shrubland 52 %; and sandbar habitat 96 %; while agricultural cropland increased six-fold and river/reservoir surface area doubled from 1892 to 2006. Net rates of erosion and accretion declined between the 1892-1950s and 1950s-2006 periods. Accretion exceeded erosion on remnant floodplain segments, resulting in declines in active channel width, particularly in 1950s-2006. Across all study segments in 2006, most cottonwood stands (67 %) were >50 years old, 22 % were 25-50 years old, and only 10 % were <25 years old. Among stands <50 years old, the higher proportion of 25-50 year old stands represents recruitment that accompanied initial post-dam channel narrowing; while declines in sandbar and shrubland area and the low proportion of stands <25 years old suggest declines in geomorphic dynamism and limited recruitment under recent river management. Future conservation and restoration efforts should focus both on limiting further loss of remnant cottonwood stands and developing approaches to restore river dynamics and cottonwood recruitment processes.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22476667</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1432-1009</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>49</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Environmental management</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Environ Manage</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>990-1008</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s00267-012-9842-5</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>Construction of six large dams and reservoirs on the Missouri River over the last 50-75 years has resulted in major landscape changes and alterations in flow patterns, with implications for riparian forests dominated by plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides). We quantified changes in land cover from 1892-1950s and the 1950s-2006 and the current extent and age structure of cottonwood forests on seven segments (two reservoir and five remnant floodplain) comprising 1127 km (53 %) of the unchannelized upper two-thirds of the Missouri River. Riparian forest area declined by 49 %; grassland 61 %; shrubland 52 %; and sandbar habitat 96 %; while agricultural cropland increased six-fold and river/reservoir surface area doubled from 1892 to 2006. Net rates of erosion and accretion declined between the 1892-1950s and 1950s-2006 periods. Accretion exceeded erosion on remnant floodplain segments, resulting in declines in active channel width, particularly in 1950s-2006. Across all study segments in 2006, most cottonwood stands (67 %) were >50 years old, 22 % were 25-50 years old, and only 10 % were <25 years old. Among stands <50 years old, the higher proportion of 25-50 year old stands represents recruitment that accompanied initial post-dam channel narrowing; while declines in sandbar and shrubland area and the low proportion of stands <25 years old suggest declines in geomorphic dynamism and limited recruitment under recent river management. Future conservation and restoration efforts should focus both on limiting further loss of remnant cottonwood stands and developing approaches to restore river dynamics and cottonwood recruitment processes.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dixon</LastName><ForeName>Mark D</ForeName><Initials>MD</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA. Mark.Dixon@usd.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Johnson</LastName><ForeName>W Carter</ForeName><Initials>WC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scott</LastName><ForeName>Michael L</ForeName><Initials>ML</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bowen</LastName><ForeName>Daniel E</ForeName><Initials>DE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rabbe</LastName><ForeName>Lisa A</ForeName><Initials>LA</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>04</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Environ Manage</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7703893</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0364-152X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000383" MajorTopicYN="N">Agriculture</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003247" MajorTopicYN="N">Conservation of Natural Resources</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017753" MajorTopicYN="N">Ecosystem</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016468" MajorTopicYN="N">Forestry</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000639" MajorTopicYN="Y">trends</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D040362" MajorTopicYN="N">Geographic Information Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000254" MajorTopicYN="Y">growth & development</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D045483" MajorTopicYN="Y">Rivers</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014481" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">United States</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014872" MajorTopicYN="N">Water Movements</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>02</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22476667</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00267-012-9842-5</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 3;104(14):5732-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17360379</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Environ Manage. 1997 Jul;21(4):533-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9175542</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2005 Apr 15;308(5720):405-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15831757</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Oecologia. 2011 Jan;165(1):31-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20803218</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):753-62</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17730396</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country><region><li>Dakota du Sud</li></region></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bowen, Daniel E" sort="Bowen, Daniel E" uniqKey="Bowen D" first="Daniel E" last="Bowen">Daniel E. Bowen</name><name sortKey="Johnson, W Carter" sort="Johnson, W Carter" uniqKey="Johnson W" first="W Carter" last="Johnson">W Carter Johnson</name><name sortKey="Rabbe, Lisa A" sort="Rabbe, Lisa A" uniqKey="Rabbe L" first="Lisa A" last="Rabbe">Lisa A. Rabbe</name><name sortKey="Scott, Michael L" sort="Scott, Michael L" uniqKey="Scott M" first="Michael L" last="Scott">Michael L. Scott</name></noCountry><country name="États-Unis"><region name="Dakota du Sud"><name sortKey="Dixon, Mark D" sort="Dixon, Mark D" uniqKey="Dixon M" first="Mark D" last="Dixon">Mark D. Dixon</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B20 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002B20 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22476667
|texte= Dynamics of plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides) forests and historical landscape change along unchannelized segments of the Missouri River, USA.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22476667" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |